A President Behind Bars? The Unprecedented Legal Dilemma of Donald Trump

Former President Donald Trump faces an unprecedented legal and constitutional dilemma as he could potentially serve a prison sentence while simultaneously securing another term in the White House

by Sededin Dedovic
A President Behind Bars? The Unprecedented Legal Dilemma of Donald Trump
© Pool / Getty Images

Former US President Donald Trump could face a prison sentence while potentially securing another presidential term. According to Politico, it is almost certain that he will not have to serve both simultaneously. If this scenario unfolds, it would lead to an unprecedented clash of constitutional interests.

On one hand, New York has a vested interest in enforcing its laws and ensuring that convicts serve their sentences fully and promptly. On the other hand, the nation has an interest in ensuring that an elected president can perform their duties without hindrance.

Legal experts agree that the national interest in having an unencumbered president would almost certainly prevail. “I cannot imagine any way in which New York could imprison him if he is elected,” Randall Eliason, a former federal prosecutor, told Politico.

If New York courts attempted to do so, federal courts would likely intervene and rule that the sentence must be suspended during the presidential term. This would open up another astonishing scenario: Trump leaving the White House in 2029 and heading to prison.

The likelihood of courts and the state having to address this issue has increased following Trump's recent conviction on 34 criminal charges in New York for falsifying business records. Judge Juan Merchan is scheduled to sentence the former president on July 11.

Merchan has broad discretion in determining the sentence, which could range from imprisonment to some form of supervised release, or a lighter penalty such as a fine or community service. A prison sentence would pose obvious practical problems if Trump were to win the November election.

The essential duties of the president—conducting cabinet meetings, receiving intelligence briefings, and meeting with world leaders—are not feasible from a cell on Rikers Island, Politico notes. Even a lighter sentence could interfere with presidential duties.

People on probation, for instance, often have strict travel restrictions.


court police pose for a group photo following the hush-money trial of former U.S. President Donald Trump outside Manhattan © Spencer Platt / Getty Images

Another possibility is that Trump appeals any prison sentence, and the outcome of the appeal remains unknown until he possibly takes office.

If his appeal is denied, he could face a confirmed prison sentence after assuming office. “We are in completely uncharted territory,” said Eliason, now a lecturer at George Washington University Law School. Although the Constitution does not explicitly exempt the president from criminal prosecution, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the president enjoys special protection from various forms of judicial interference.

“The president occupies a unique position in the constitutional scheme,” wrote the high court in a 1982 case, rejecting a civil lawsuit against former President Richard Nixon. Legal experts believe that judges would likely rule that, since the Constitution states that federal law takes precedence over states' rights to enforce their laws in most areas, New York cannot imprison Trump while he is serving as president.

“When there is a conflict, federal law prevails, and you cannot allow a state to interfere with some very important federal functions,” Eliason said. The risk of a constitutional conflict could discourage Merchan from imposing a prison sentence on Trump at all.

“If you are a judge, treating this defendant as you would any other should include the possibility of a sentence. At the same time, you cannot ignore the practical difficulties that come with imprisoning a former president.

What do you do about Secret Service protection and all those other issues? Do you keep him in solitary confinement the whole time?” Eliason remarked.

Supporters of former U.S.

President Donald Trump cheer as his motorcade leaves Manhattan Criminal Court after he was found guilt© Spencer Platt / Getty Images

Merchan has already publicly noted some implications of imprisoning Trump. A few weeks ago, while discussing Trump’s repeated violations of restrictions in the case, the judge observed that there are many complications and potential downsides to imprisoning Trump.

“Mr. Trump, it is important to understand that the last thing I want to do is put you in jail,” Merchan said on May 6. “You are a former president of the United States, and perhaps the next one. There are many reasons why jail is really a last resort for me,” reported Al Jazeera.

The maximum sentence for falsifying business records is four years in prison. Even a lighter sentence, such as probation, would likely pose legal challenges, especially if Trump were elected. Throughout the process, it is clear that combining presidential duties with legal consequences would present an unprecedented legal and constitutional dilemma for the American system.

Moreover, the logistical challenges of incarcerating a former or sitting president are staggering. The Secret Service would have to ensure Trump’s safety even within a prison environment, possibly necessitating special arrangements or even solitary confinement to protect him from other inmates.

This could raise human rights concerns and further complicate his ability to perform presidential duties, even in a limited capacity. A president in prison would likely be unable to travel for diplomatic meetings, potentially isolating the United States on the world stage.

This scenario could undermine the country’s ability to engage in critical negotiations and maintain its global leadership role.

Donald Trump President Donald Trump White House