Netanyahu's Alleged Strategy with Hamas: An In-depth Look

The recent report from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz has ignited a political storm, suggesting a controversial approach by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu towards the Palestinian extremist group, Hamas.

by Faruk Imamovic
SHARE
Netanyahu's Alleged Strategy with Hamas: An In-depth Look
© Getty Images News/Sean Gallup

The recent report from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz has ignited a political storm, suggesting a controversial approach by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu towards the Palestinian extremist group, Hamas. Evidence presented seems to suggest that Netanyahu may have indirectly aided Hamas in order to counter the formation of a Palestinian state.

He was quoted saying to his Likud party's Knesset members in March 2019: "Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy." It's paramount to note that these alleged remarks have not been validated by secondary sources, and thus should be approached with a measure of caution.

Tal Schneider Weighs In

Tal Schneider, from the Times of Israel, brought further light to the topic, indicating that Netanyahu's alleged comments align with the strategic approach he's been known to adopt. According to Schneider, Netanyahu's governance displayed patterns that neither fiercely opposed nor undermined Hamas's dominance in the Gaza Strip.

In fact, there are suggestions that it might have indirectly fortified it. Highlighting a possible web of internal communication on this strategy, Schneider noted, "the same message was echoed by right-wing commentators, who may have received briefings on the issue or spoken to senior Likud leaders and understood the message." If this is accurate, it implies that Netanyahu's strategy was not solely his but possibly a collective thought process within Likud's higher ranks.

Hamas: A Continuing Threat

It is essential to understand the backdrop against which these revelations are made. Hamas has been a significant player in the region's turbulence. The group's recent attack resulted in the tragic loss of several lives — both military and civilian — emphasizing the volatility and stakes of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

This attack targeted southern Israeli border towns, leading to their temporary occupation, which only concluded upon intervention from the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). While the veracity of the Haaretz report still awaits further validation, the implications of Netanyahu's supposed strategy remain vast and thought-provoking.

It raises questions about the complexities of geopolitics and the fine line between strategy and endangering national security. As this story unfolds, it stands as a testament to the intricate dynamics of the Israeli-Palestinian landscape.

Benjamin Netanyahu
SHARE