The EU's Carbon Tax: Driving Up Car Prices and Diplomatic Tensions

The European Union's new carbon border tax is sparking debate and tension on a global scale.

by Faruk Imamovic
SHARE
The EU's Carbon Tax: Driving Up Car Prices and Diplomatic Tensions
© Getty Images News/Omar Marques

The European Union's new carbon border tax is sparking debate and tension on a global scale. A recent estimate from the American consulting firm, Boston Consulting Group (BCG), suggests this tax might lead to a noticeable increase in the price of new cars for consumers.

Meanwhile, several countries are voicing their concerns, seeing the tax as discriminatory and potentially in violation of global trade regulations.

The Financial Implications for Car Buyers

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), initiated by the EU, is a tax levied on non-EU importers based on the carbon they emit during their production processes.

This especially affects sectors like steel and cement – key materials in the manufacture of cars. According to BCG's findings, an average four-door car emits approximately seven tons of carbon dioxide (CO2). Remarkably, just under half of this amount comes from the steel and aluminum used in its production.

With the present tax rate standing at €82.90 per ton of carbon, this means the average new car price might see an upswing of €580.30. This new burden comes atop other financial obligations car manufacturers face, such as purchasing the rights to emit CO2 (via the ETS) to secure their import necessities.

Global Tensions on the Rise

Poland, taking a stand against the CBAM, announced its decision to challenge the tax mechanism before the European Court of Justice in late August. The Polish government argues that introducing the CBAM should have required unanimous support within the EU, rather than just a qualified majority.

The nation's climate minister, Anna Moskwa, raised concerns over potential disparities in energy cost hikes across the Union due to the CBAM, emphasizing that it goes against the principle of energy solidarity. But Poland isn't alone in its disapproval.

Countries like Brazil, South Africa, India, and China perceive the CBAM as discriminatory. Forecasts show that Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine could be the nations most adversely impacted. While some of these countries may wish to raise disputes against the EU through the World Trade Organization (WTO), they would have to wait until 2026 to demonstrate the damage they've incurred.

Furthermore, the Brussels Signal portal posits that if the WTO discovers the EU charges varying tax rates to different countries for identical products or displays preferential treatment towards domestic products over foreign ones, it might rule against the Union.

European Union European
SHARE