United Nations Calls for an End to the US Embargo on Cuba

In a significant rebuke to the United States, the United Nations General Assembly has once again voiced its disapproval of the long-standing US economic and trade embargo against Cuba.

by Faruk Imamovic
SHARE
United Nations Calls for an End to the US Embargo on Cuba
© Getty Images News/Johannes Simon

In a significant rebuke to the United States, the United Nations General Assembly has once again voiced its disapproval of the long-standing US economic and trade embargo against Cuba. The assembly's vote, overwhelmingly against the embargo, marked yet another plea for the cessation of a policy that has shaped US-Cuban relations for over six decades.

Global Consensus Against the Embargo

The results of the vote were telling: 187 nations cast their ballots in favor of lifting the embargo, underscoring a near-universal consensus on this issue. Only the United States and Israel stood in opposition, while Ukraine, for reasons not articulated in the session, chose to abstain.

The resolution, known officially as "the necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba," aims to spotlight the sustained economic hardship that this policy has inflicted upon the Cuban people and Cuban citizens residing abroad.

It's a recurring theme at the United Nations, with annual resolutions calling for an end to the embargo, which first took effect in 1960. The General Assembly expressed its concern that, despite previous resolutions dating back to 1992, the embargo persists.

This action, deemed contrary to the UN Charter and international law, continues to be a thorn in the side of international relations and a topic of significant global discourse.

US Defends Its Position

The United States, represented by Paul Folmsbee, remained unwavering in its stance.

Folmsbee articulated a clear message: the United States “stands resolutely” with the Cuban people in their quest for a future enriched by human rights and essential freedoms. The sanctions, according to him, are merely "one set of tools" employed by the United States to encourage Cuba towards democracy and the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

He acknowledged the adversities faced by the Cuban population and clarified that the sanctions were not all-encompassing, with specific exemptions in place for food, medicine, and other humanitarian aid. However, he stood firm on the resolution, imploring the General Assembly to turn its attention to the Cuban Government's own adherence to human rights obligations and to hear the aspirations of the Cuban people for self-determination.

This divide between the US position and the global perspective highlights the complexities of international politics, where human rights, national sovereignty, and international law often collide. As the world continues to grapple with issues of trade, governance, and humanitarian concerns, the situation between the United States and Cuba remains a poignant example of the enduring challenges that face the international community.

United States
SHARE