Iceland's Seismic Dilemma: The Controversial Lava Barrier Tax

Iceland, a nation renowned for its stunning landscapes and geological marvels, is facing a seismic challenge of historic proportions.

by Faruk Imamovic
SHARE
Iceland's Seismic Dilemma: The Controversial Lava Barrier Tax
© Getty Images News/Sean Gallup

Iceland, a nation renowned for its stunning landscapes and geological marvels, is facing a seismic challenge of historic proportions. Over the past weekend, authorities declared a state of emergency on the Reykjanes peninsula in the southwest, following a swarm of hundreds of earthquakes.

This seismic activity has escalated concerns, prompting the evacuation of thousands and sparking discussions about disaster preparedness.

Taxing Times for Safety

In a decisive move, Iceland's parliament has approved a novel tax measure aimed at bolstering the nation's defenses against potential volcanic eruptions.

This tax, targeting residential properties, is designed to fund the construction of lava barriers to safeguard crucial infrastructure in the seismic hotbed of the southwest. The urgency of the situation is underscored by seismologists' warnings that an eruption is not a question of 'if', but 'when'

The proposed tax is calculated at 0.08% of a property’s fire insurance value, with a homeowner of a property valued at ISK 100 million expected to contribute an additional ISK 8,000 annually. This tax, although temporary, spanning a three-year period, is projected to generate around ISK 1 billion for the state.

This significant sum is earmarked for the construction of protective structures such as dikes and canals, particularly around Svartsengi, a critical geothermal power plant. However, this initiative has not been met without opposition.

Some parliamentarians, like Pirate Party MP Þórhildur Sunna Ævarsdóttir and Centre Party Chairman Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson, argue for funding these essential structures with existing tax revenues instead.

Their concerns echo historical instances where temporary taxes, introduced in response to natural disasters, morphed into permanent fixtures.

The Cost of Preparedness

Iceland’s approach to disaster preparedness, though unique, is not without precedent.

Following the Heimaey eruption in 1973, the government implemented a 2% sales tax increase to aid reconstruction efforts in the Westman Islands. This tax, initially temporary, was never revoked, illustrating the long-term fiscal impact of emergency measures.

The situation in Reykjanes serves as a stark reminder of the power of nature and the complex decisions governments face in safeguarding their citizens and infrastructure against such formidable forces.

SHARE