X Under Fire: Lawmakers Allege Platform Profits from Hamas Propaganda


X Under Fire: Lawmakers Allege Platform Profits from Hamas Propaganda
© Getty Images

A recent controversy has surfaced involving X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, as it faces accusations from House Democrats of profiting from Hamas-related propaganda. This allegation comes amid a broader discussion about the platform's role in disseminating information during the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Lawmakers Raise Concerns

In a letter addressed to X's owner Elon Musk and CEO Linda Yaccarino, more than two dozen U.S. lawmakers, including prominent figures like Reps. Adam Schiff, Daniel Goldman, and Jamie Raskin, expressed their distress.

They cited reports from independent research groups like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, NewsGuard, and the Tech Transparency Project, which purportedly found evidence of X profiting from content associated with Hamas, a U.S.-sanctioned terror group.

These reports claim the identification of X subscribers sharing content with Hamas iconography and violent imagery. Furthermore, there are allegations of accounts promoting misleading narratives about the war, with these posts receiving significant global viewership.

The Controversy Deepens

The lawmakers' letter underscores a critical issue facing X: its content moderation policies. The platform, having reportedly reduced its content moderation staff over the past year, is accused of allowing and benefiting from the spread of terrorist propaganda.

This situation has raised serious concerns about the responsibilities of social media platforms in regulating and filtering content, especially concerning recognized terror groups.

X's Response Amidst Uncertainty

In an unexpected move, Elon Musk announced on Tuesday that X would donate all revenue from advertising and subscriptions related to the war in Gaza to hospitals in Israel and the Red Cross/Crescent in Gaza.

However, details about what specific content this pertains to and whether this announcement is a direct response to the lawmakers' letter remain unclear. Joe Benarroch, X's Head of Business Operations, affirmed the donation would be significant, yet did not provide further clarification.

This development reflects the ongoing challenge social media platforms face in balancing freedom of expression with the responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful content. As X navigates these turbulent waters, the broader implications for social media regulation and corporate accountability remain a topic of intense debate.