Biden Maintains Support for Israel Amid Gaza Crisis

The Biden administration's stance on the conflict involving Gaza and Israel draws a complex, controversial picture.

by Faruk Imamovic
Biden Maintains Support for Israel Amid Gaza Crisis
© Getty Images/Drew Angerer

The Biden administration's stance on the conflict involving Gaza and Israel draws a complex, controversial picture. At the heart of the issue is President Joe Biden's unwavering support for Israel, even as the conservative death toll in Gaza soars to alarming numbers, with over 13,000 children among the deceased.

This steadfast backing comes in the form of an extraordinary $14 billion in additional military aid, enabling Israel to continue its occupation and bombing of Gaza. Despite international outcry for a cessation of Israel’s military assault on a defenseless population, Biden's administration seems undeterred, preparing new shipments of powerful munitions to Tel Aviv.

The situation is further complicated by the Senate's recent passing of significant military aid for Israel, a move that underscores the administration's stance. Biden's outright rejection of using military sales as leverage against Israel reveals a commitment to a strategy that many critics argue exacerbates an already dire humanitarian crisis.

The Humanitarian Crisis and International Reactions

As Gaza faces a catastrophic humanitarian situation, the international community watches with growing concern. The conservative death toll nearing 30,000, including a staggering number of children, paints a grim picture of the ongoing conflict.

The Biden administration, however, attempts to navigate these turbulent waters by projecting a compassionate stance toward the people of Gaza, despite actions that suggest otherwise. The International Court of Justice's involvement, ruling that South Africa’s genocide suit against Israel should proceed, marks a pivotal moment in the conflict's international dimension.

Yet, Tel Aviv's response, intensifying military operations and laying siege to hospitals, signals a disregard for global judicial scrutiny. The proposed creation of sprawling tent cities for evacuating Palestinians, funded by the U.S.

and its partners, raises ethical and logistical questions about the feasibility of such plans in ensuring the safety of civilians.

Diplomatic Maneuvers and Political Implications

At the intersection of humanitarian tragedy and geopolitical strategy lies a web of diplomatic maneuvers.

The Biden administration's nuanced position on a potential Israeli ground offensive in Rafah, conditional on a "credible and executable plan" for civilian safety, suggests a complex balancing act. This stance, while appearing cautious, aligns with broader strategic interests, including the delicate relationship with Egypt and the broader Middle East.

The Rafah situation, with Israel's proposed ground invasion, could precipitate a diplomatic crisis, particularly with Egypt, a key player in the region. The White House's support for targeted strikes, yet reluctance towards a full-scale ground campaign, underscores a cautious approach to an increasingly volatile situation.

Amidst these challenges, the narrative around Palestinian statehood and the Biden-Netanyahu dynamic unfolds. The administration's focus on linking a roadmap for Palestinian statehood with an end to the war represents a strategic pivot, aiming to leverage geopolitical developments for potential electoral gains.

However, Netanyahu's firm rejection of recognizing a Palestinian state highlights the deep-seated complexities of achieving peace in the region.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken Visits Middle East© Getty Images


Politics and the Gaza Conflict

The ongoing conflict in Gaza not only presents a humanitarian and diplomatic challenge but also poses a significant dilemma for U.S. domestic politics, particularly for President Joe Biden as he navigates the treacherous waters of an upcoming election.

The administration's handling of the situation, marked by substantial military support for Israel amidst a devastating conservative death toll in Gaza, reflects a complex interplay of ethical considerations, political strategy, and electoral calculus.

Electoral Politics and Humanitarian Concerns

At the heart of the Biden administration's approach to the Gaza crisis is a delicate balancing act between maintaining strategic alliances and managing the political ramifications of its foreign policy decisions.

The recent Senate approval of $14 billion in additional military aid for Israel underscores the depth of U.S. commitment to its ally, even as the humanitarian situation in Gaza deteriorates. This steadfast support comes amidst growing scrutiny over Biden's reluctance to leverage U.S.

military sales as a means to influence Israel's military strategy, raising questions about the intersection of ethics and politics in foreign policy. The administration's efforts to project an image of compassion for the people of Gaza while preparing new munitions shipments to Israel highlight a dichotomy between public statements and policy actions.

This juxtaposition is particularly poignant given the staggering civilian casualties in Gaza, including thousands of children, which have prompted international calls for a ceasefire and a reevaluation of U.S. support for Israel's military operations.

The Role of Public Image and Campaign Strategy

As the 2024 U.S. election looms, the White House's concern over the potential electoral impact of the Gaza conflict becomes increasingly evident. Attempts to stabilize Biden's public image amid controversies surrounding his mental acuity and past public statements reflect a broader strategy to mitigate political fallout.

The administration's narrative of losing patience with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu serves as a critical element of this strategy, aiming to reconcile Biden's long-standing support for Israel with growing domestic and international unease over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The intricate dance between Biden and Netanyahu, particularly regarding Palestinian statehood and the possibility of a two-state solution, further complicates the U.S.' s position. While the administration seeks to leverage this issue as a safe battleground against Netanyahu's vulnerabilities, the ultimate goal appears to be securing a political victory that can be touted in the election campaign, even as the situation on the ground in Gaza remains dire.