Investors Divided Over Elon Musk’s Massive Tesla Pay Package

Elon Musk's High-Stakes Gamble: The Future of Tesla at a Crossroads

by Faruk Imamovic
Investors Divided Over Elon Musk’s Massive Tesla Pay Package
© Getty Images/Sean Gallup

Elon Musk, known for his audacious visions, has never shied away from high-risk endeavors. From colonizing Mars with SpaceX to revolutionizing transportation with Tesla Bots and underground highways, his ventures have always aimed to push the boundaries of possibility. Yet, perhaps his boldest move was a personal wager tied to Tesla's financial performance, linking his compensation to a series of nearly impossible targets. This article examines the unfolding drama around Musk's compensation package and its implications for Tesla’s future.

Musk’s Unprecedented Compensation Plan

In 2018, Musk proposed a radical compensation plan to Tesla’s board, tying his pay directly to the company’s financial milestones. If he failed to elevate Tesla’s market value from $59 billion to $650 billion within a decade, he would earn nothing. Many commentators doubted the feasibility of these targets, calling them "jaw-dropping" and "unrealistic." Nevertheless, the board approved the plan, underscoring their confidence in Musk’s vision and leadership.

Not everyone shared this optimism. Richard Tornetta, a Tesla shareholder with a modest holding, filed a lawsuit against the company, arguing that the compensation plan was excessive and unfair to investors. The case, which eventually reached a Delaware court in 2022, highlighted the contentious nature of Musk’s pay package. Despite significant achievements, including Tesla’s brief tenure as a trillion-dollar company, the court ruled in January to void the package, citing its extraordinary scale and the undue influence Musk had over the board.

Shareholders' Dilemma: To Pay or Not to Pay

As of now, Musk has successfully met nearly all of the financial milestones set in 2018. This week, Tesla’s shareholders face a crucial decision: whether to approve Musk’s compensation, now swollen to nearly $50 billion, making it the largest in U.S. corporate history. This decision comes at a pivotal moment for Tesla, which is grappling with increased competition in the electric vehicle market, particularly from more affordable Chinese manufacturers.

“This vote signifies a critical juncture for Tesla,” says Mike Ramsey, an automotive analyst at Gartner. “Shareholders are beginning to question the extent of Musk’s control over the company and whether his continued leadership is aligned with their interests.”

The debate over Musk’s compensation underscores broader concerns about Tesla’s strategic direction. John Colley, a professor of practice in strategy and leadership at Warwick Business School, suggests that Tesla’s maturation as a business necessitates a shift in leadership style. “The company now faces challenges typical of established carmakers,” he explains. “Whether Musk’s visionary approach is suitable for a mature business remains uncertain.”

Investors Divided Over Elon Musk’s Massive Tesla Pay Package
Investors Divided Over Elon Musk’s Massive Tesla Pay Package© Getty Images/Maja Hitij

Divisive Opinions Among Investors

The issue of Musk’s pay has polarized Tesla’s investor community. Influential voices such as Tesla board chair Robyn Denholm and billionaire investor Ron Baron have expressed strong support for the compensation package. “Tesla is intrinsically linked to Musk’s leadership,” Baron stated in an open letter, emphasizing Musk’s pivotal role in the company’s success.

However, opposition has been equally vocal. Two major proxy advisory groups have advised institutional investors to vote against the package, citing concerns over its size and fairness. Notably, significant shareholders from the Nordic countries, including Norway’s trillion-dollar sovereign wealth fund and the nation’s largest pension fund, KLP, have pledged to vote against the pay deal. Kiran Aziz, head of responsible investments at KLP, articulated their stance: “While we recognize Tesla’s remarkable growth, the total award value is excessive. Moreover, Tesla needs to improve its labor relations significantly.”

The Broader Implications

Behind the scenes, Tesla has embarked on an aggressive campaign to garner support for Musk’s compensation. The company has invested in advertisements on platforms like Google and X (formerly Twitter), urging investors to protect their interests by backing the proposal. A dedicated website was also launched to persuade shareholders to overturn the Delaware court’s decision, emphasizing Musk’s unparalleled contributions to Tesla’s success.

“This level of advertising for a proxy vote is unprecedented,” observes Robert Anderson, a law professor at the University of Arkansas. He attributes this to Musk’s unique ability to generate publicity, which has both amplified the stakes and the scrutiny surrounding the vote. Anderson also notes that the proposed move of Tesla’s incorporation from Delaware to Texas adds another layer of complexity to the situation.

The outcome of this vote will hinge on a diverse mix of institutional and retail investors. Retail investors, who hold about 44% of Tesla’s shares, will play a particularly crucial role. There is growing concern among them that if Musk’s compensation is not approved, his focus might shift more towards his other ventures, such as SpaceX and X, potentially to Tesla’s detriment.

Looking Ahead: A Test of Leadership

Whatever the result, this vote will undoubtedly reshape the dynamic between Musk and Tesla. For years, Musk and Tesla have promoted the idea that the company is more than just an automaker, positioning it as a tech and innovation leader. Musk himself has often highlighted Tesla’s advancements in AI and robotics, suggesting these are the true measures of the company’s value.

“The resistance from shareholders indicates a new chapter for Tesla,” says Ramsey. “It’s a recognition that no single individual, not even Elon Musk, should wield unlimited influence over a company’s future.”

Elon Musk Tesla